When, just about two hundred years ago, in 1805 to be precise, Sultan Selim III issued a firman ordering that Serbs from Sarajevo and its surroundings should no longer be hanged or impaled in the courtyard and at the gate of the Old Church in Sarajevo, this was not a consequence of the Sharia judiciary of the Ottoman Empire providing legal protection to Serbs, but a direct consequence of the reality of the First Serbian Uprising of 1804.

The sentiment of Christians in the then-occupied Bosnia and Herzegovina is best illustrated by the report of two Franciscan friars from Široki Brijeg, who wrote to their superior archbishop in Đakovo that they had barely managed to prevent their flock, in a surge of national fervor, from following Vožd Karađorđe.

That the decision of Selim III was driven by the Christian rebellion rather than a change in the stance of Sharia judiciary towards them is confirmed by the continuation of his decree. Namely, the firman stated that the punishment of hanging and impalement should continue (even though there was already a practice of crucifying Serbs on the main gate of the church courtyard—this being the oldest place of worship in Sarajevo and its surroundings), but at “more suitable” locations in other neighbourhoods!

Science has proven that, following the tragic experience of the Holocaust, the DNA structure of Jews was altered in a certain way. Can we then assume the extent of transgenerational trauma among Serbs and other Christians after nearly five centuries of suffering and terror under such a Sharia judiciary imposed by the Ottoman-Turkish aggressor? Did such a legal system and judiciary over those nearly five hundred years have any impact on changes in the DNA structure of Serbs?

At the same time, the liturgical consciousness and ethos of the Serbian people and their elites preserved the awareness of individual responsibility for each person, thereby ensuring an opportunity for every new generation. It was precisely for this reason that the poet’s verses were written: “Remain here, the sun of a foreign sky…”, when, after the Austro-Hungarian occupation, Serbs of the Muslim faith were leaving the present-day territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina en masse and emigrating to Turkey.

It was precisely this new occupier who, through its policy of identity engineering, divided the Serbs along religious lines and sowed the seeds of the “Bosniak” project. Over time, this project ideologically mutated, only to reemerge in a new form at the Holiday Inn in late September 1993. At its core, it was pan-Islamist, while functionally serving Euro-Atlanticist and globalist interests.

To the great misfortune of everyone in the former Yugoslavia and beyond, instead of Fikret Abdić, a representative of traditional Islam who was elected in democratic elections, his place was deceitfully taken by the author of the Muslim Brotherhood‘s pan-Islamist manifesto—Alija Izetbegović. Thus, the ideologue and leader of the Muslim Brotherhood structure in Bosnia and Herzegovina became the first “Zelensky” in Europe, leading his people—and all the surrounding nations—into a bloody civil war to establish an Islamic state in Europe, where Sharia law would rule, namely Bosnia and Herzegovina, while simultaneously facilitating NATO’s expansion eastward.

At the beginning of the civil war, they managed to forcibly take over the Islamic Community in Bosnia and Herzegovina and appoint Mustafa Cerić as the reis, allowing the Muslim Brotherhood to seize control of this religious structure, which they continue to dominate to this day.

All current political leaders and members of the political and military leadership of the Muslim-Bosniak community emerged from Alija’s mantle, from Lagumdžija onwards. According to available information today, one of Alija Izetbegović’s closest associates secured approximately 18 million dollars in aid for Osama bin Laden. Therefore, it is no surprise that Islamist structures from Bosnia and Herzegovina were directly involved in planning and executing the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. The common people—both Muslim and non-Muslim—were sacrificed in the pursuit of the radical goals of political Islam.

Since the strategic goal of creating an Islamic, Sharia-based state in Europe was not fully achieved through armed conflict due to the signing of the international peace agreement in Dayton, its implementation continued by other means. At first, the Christians in Bosnia and Herzegovina—Serbs and Croats—did not fully understand why the Muslim/Bosniak side in BiH continued its project of majoritization of non-Muslims and the creation of a de facto unitary state.

Their biggest obstacle was the fact that Dayton Bosnia and Herzegovina was established through an international peace agreement, and its constitution—Annex 4 of that agreement—is also an international treaty signed by the Republic of Srpska and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina as the warring parties and contracting entities. For this reason, they required the assistance of the political West and Islamic countries such as Iran, Turkey, Qatar and others to create a judicial system at the state level, formed from the unnatural “union” of globalist lawfare (the misuse of legal frameworks to destroy a political opponent) and the Sharia-based aggressor practices mentioned earlier in the text.

To ensure that this judicial mutant—built on rules dictated by the most powerful players of the global West while simultaneously relying on the aforementioned Sharia-based practices that flagrantly discriminate against Christians and other non-Muslims in Bosnia and Herzegovina—also got a “hump on its back” was a task one failed German politician with the mentality of a Nazi Gauleiter took upon himself, along with Germany itself, which sent him here.

Just as the “kind souls” from abroad and their local allies once tried to convince us that the political West, or rather the globalist occult elites, were not attacking and killing us but only the “evil” Slobodan Milošević, today they assure us in the same way that they are not attacking the Serbian people and Republic of Srpska, but only the “evil” Milorad Dodik. Perhaps the problem lies with us, since no matter whom we elected as a political leader in the last three decades and more, they somehow always end up being labeled as “evil” in the eyes of our enemies and the misguided souls among us—prompting them to attempt to destroy us in order to remove this so-called “evil” man.

U.S. Vice President Vance recently addressed the established practice of lawfare in Germany, which is based on the rules of globalist occult structures, mentioning the case of Romania in the process. Naturally, Vice President Vance, as a sincere Christian and advocate of traditional values, would certainly have something to say about the political persecution of the legally elected President of Republika Srpska, a signatory party to Annex 4, the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

We can only imagine what President Donald Trump might say—or perhaps will say—if he learns and fully understands that, for decades, U.S. taxpayer money has been funding the birth and development of a globalist-Sharia judicial mutant, with a Nazi “hump” as the cherry on top.

The leadership of Republika Srpska has a constitutional and international legal obligation to protect, by all available democratic means, the Serbian constituent people and all citizens of Srpska, the Dayton Constitution—i.e., Annex 4 as an international treaty to which it is a signatory—and to uphold the role and mandate of the Constitutional Court in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Moreover, Srpska is also duty-bound to safeguard the Dayton Peace Agreement itself, which, along with all its annexes, remains a binding part of international law pursuant to UN Security Council Resolution 1031.

Despite a painful history, Serbs and Croats have managed to find common ground for coexistence in Bosnia and Herzegovina, with the foundation of that understanding being the Dayton structure of BiH and Annex 4 as an international treaty serving the function of a constitution.

However, once the globalist Murphy departs from BiH and the “hump” is removed from the mutant, the issue of pan-Islamist and globalist structures will remain—forces that are doing everything possible to prevent the development of stability through the Dayton framework of BiH.

Anyone familiar with the history and political realities of this region knows very well that dismantling the Dayton structure of BiH means establishing a unitary, that is, an Islamic Sharia-based state.

Thus, when we scratch beneath the surface of media and political narratives, the ultimate question arises: Will peace and stability in BiH be preserved through the institutional defense of the Dayton Constitution and the Dayton-based BiH, or will the judicial mutant with its “hump” pave the way, through its anti-Dayton actions, for the realization of the pan-Islamist project—the creation of a unitary, that is, an Islamic/Sharia state in Europe?

The experience of Christians—Serbs and Croats—as well as a significant number of adherents of traditional Islam in Bosnia and Herzegovina, tells us that a return to the reality of the Sharia-based occupier judiciary described at the beginning of this text can bring good to no one.

Whether we like it or not, we have no choice but to adhere to every letter and comma of the Dayton Constitution, which we negotiated and signed in Dayton and which was verified by the UN Security Council. Peace and stability for our children should be the primary goal of every rational and well-intentioned person.